One of the overwhelming Myths about this sorry saga is the idea this was just a spat with John Densmore who did not want Ray and Robby using The Doors name. Or even playing Doors songs as some of the lies that were spread stated.
Densmore came in for some vicious attacks made up of inaccuracies and downright lies many of which appeared on the official Doors forum he himself helped pay for.
The Trial went a lot deeper than that as Ray and Robby countersued John for the control of very The Doors name.
They argued in court that Densmore was denying them the right to take advantage of the many lucrative opportunities that came their way.
Ray and Robby both denied under oath that the Doors ever had a veto system where one said 'no' then the answer was 'no'.
There was an hilarious moment in the courtroom where Ray Manzarek ,who had advocated that the Doors Veto was simply a Myth perpetrated by the media, was cross examined and confronted with his own words in his own biography 'Light My Fire.' and his Myth & reality disc.
Here he had set out the very principles that governed The Doors and which he said did not exist.
From the Judgement document on page #1 of this thread.
5. Sixth Cause Of Action For Declaratory Relief
The only suggestion to the contrary about “majority rule: comes from the defendants’ post litigation statements, but their position is belied by their own words prior to litigation. On the commentary track to The Doors Collection DVD, Manzarek admits that any member of The Doors had a veto, a statement repeated in the liner notes of his own spoken word compact disc Myth & Reality:
“The Doors all had veto power. If one guy didn’t want to do something it wasn’t done. That’s the way it always worked out with The Doors. It was a four way split of all The Doors’ money, totally democratic with veto power.”
The Court rejects the assertion that this requirement was not known to Manzarek and Krieger or that the written agreements did not accurately reflect their understanding of governance. First, these were college-educated men represented by legal counsel when the written agreements were signed.
The level of lies the Manzarek camp uttered in court was quite staggering as they tried to portray Densmore as someone stuck in his 60s bubble.
They even tried to say Jim Morrison would side with them in this argument when the only instance on record showed he sided with Densmore.
So desperate was the Manzarek camp they appealed the 2005 Judgment and took it to the Supreme Court which threw it out in 2008 thus ending the whole episode.
The damage done to the Doors name was incalculable.
The effects of this are still felt today as many many Doors fans have given up the Net and many fine forums and sites have vanished as a result of all the ill feeling generated by the fallout from Manzarek's desperate lies.
I myself was accused of being the main instigator of this bad feeling that had all but wrecked the Doors Forum by the Doors manager himself on the Densmore forum.
My response was to publicly call Jeff Jampol a liar and state that I was not asking for an apology from him but demanded one on that very forum.
After John Densmore himself was given the information regarding the arguments between the pro Densmore and pro Manzarek camps that had brought so much turmoil to the Doors own forum I got just that as Jeff Jampol was forced to come cap in hand to the Densmore forum and apologise publicly for his lies and accusations against me.

Hilarious as it was to see that fool so humbled publicly it was a sad state of affairs that we had fallen so far as a community.
Today the Doors world on the Net is a very different place.
Doors Official Forums now are desolate places where members need to watch their backs and mind their ps and qs.
Not a place for people like me who have never been afraid to say my piece and back it up when required.
The Lizard Lounge or Doors Official Forum as it is now was once a wonderful place to discuss The Doors. There was a time I practically lived there, so interesting was the conversation and the fans who generated it.
Now as a result of the trial of 2003/08 all that's gone. What is left is a parody of what once was. The liar Jampol after being caught out lying about the Matrix tapes on the Doors forum finally threw out his toys and since then joining a Doors forum has become a hell of a lot harder than it was

The trial did indeed do some good as it nailed Manzarek as the liar he was and prevented him using The Doors to sell any crap with a big cheque.
Densmore to this day keeps insanity in check even if he has had the odd blip with the shoe and the rubbish film of 2009.
Doors fans should be grateful he fought the fight but sadly the battle lines will always be drawn on party lines.
Manzarek supporters hate John. Do Densmore supporters hate Ray and Robby?
Personally no. I supported John even before he started his legal action but I never hated Ray.
I can't abide the man but love the musician. Same with Robby.
That is the fallout for me that this trial has generated.
My loss of respect for all three Doors as people.
The document that won the day for Densmore showed The Doors in a different light.
We discuss it on several threads here.
Shattered forever a rose tinted view of The Doors I myself had for over 30 years.
It's a sad indictment of us as a community that we could never build that bridge. The liar Jampol promised that the Doors Forum would change and allowed all the Densmore supporters who were unjustly removed back again. But like all his promises that was another lie. It lasted about a month.

Will this generation of Doors fans ever bury the hatchet. Only in each other I am afraid.
